data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/128b6/128b61eb29eb530282d750ef9c5e47b775cdd9fc" alt="star"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/128b6/128b61eb29eb530282d750ef9c5e47b775cdd9fc" alt="star"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/128b6/128b61eb29eb530282d750ef9c5e47b775cdd9fc" alt="star"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff9cc/ff9ccf1849b05eb93b33b52415ee847f723f93c9" alt="half star"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e3c7/6e3c764632652a284d0266a4ba921c21a54f91d8" alt="no star"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21a7c/21a7c066fd80b16a295c913209c3e6e51d729cd7" alt=""
If any band is the embodiment of everything you might love or detest about Eighties revivalism it’s undoubtedly White Rose Movement. Just like ‘Love Is A Number’ and ‘Alsatian’ before it, be it the dated synths, Finn Vines’ highly sheened, almost digitalised voice or the “aye-aye-aye-ah” backing vocals, ‘Girls In the Back’ couldn’t be more retro if it tried. True, it’s easy to hate the band for parodying an amalgam of bands and their hyperbolised scenster-isms, but luckily this track has enough weight to surely win even a hardened cynic over. Surprisingly decent, then.
Register now and have your comments approved automatically!